To let evaluations with before training, we and additionally applied nonspatial take-recapture answers to imagine mature jaguar density (discover Appendix B getting procedures and you will show).
I estimated densities alone for men, reproductive people, and nonreproductive ladies. I tried to fit activities straight to findings out-of cubs, but their sparse need records don’t offer adequate data for an optimum likelihood analysis. So you can imagine cub occurrence, i increased the fresh new reproductive female density from our greatest model by indicate number of cubs each reproductive ladies. This type of prices greeting formula out of overall jaguar occurrence and you may people construction for males, nonreproductive women, reproductive lady, and you can cubs.
Our total sampling energy is actually a dozen,302 cam pitfall-evening. I acquired 1465 grabs, as well as 1369 with recognizable individuals (Desk step one). In total, i identified 42 jaguars, along with 14 men, fourteen adult ladies, and fourteen cubs. Of your own fourteen snap mature female, 7 have been positively recreating and you may shoot having cubs (Photos D1, D2). Although we joined equal quantities of boys, women, and you will cubs regarding investigation area, the latest bring frequency each and every category differed: 58% out-of understood photographs had been those of men (798 captures), 33% off identifiable catches was the ones from girls (452), and only 9% was indeed those of cubs (119). On average, males were seized 56 moments each, people thirty two times, and cubs merely 9 moments. Reproductive women got slightly higher final amount out-of catches than nonreproductive people (257 rather than 195, respectively) and higher average level of grabs per individual (38 in the place of 28). Reproductive female was in fact more frequently captured by yourself (109 times) than simply followed closely by cubs (69 captures) during the period of understood little ones dependence. However, cubs have been filed more frequently due to their mothers (83 personal captures) than simply by yourself (thirty-six catches).
Of the 32 models analyzed with the secr package with sex/reproductive status and sessions as covariates, those which did not allow density to vary across sessions obtained the lowest AICc values. In contrast, models assuming density variation across sessions received less support (Tables 2, C1). The top secr model for adult jaguars included an effect of sex/female reproductive status on D, ? 0, and ? and between session variation in ? 0. All three parameters differed significantly between sex/reproductive status groups (Table 3). Baseline detection probability was lowest for reproductive females (0.04 on average), whereas nonreproductive females had the greatest baseline detectability (0.13 on average) and males intermediate (0.08 on average) to the two female reproductive classes. Males had the largest values of estimated movement distribution (? = 2.97 ± 0.09 km), while reproductive and nonreproductive females obtained smaller ? values (2.04 ± 0.11 and 2.32 ± 0.19 km, respectively). Estimated https://datingmentor.org/nl/aseksuele-dating/ densities were higher for reproductive females and males (1.97 ± 0.33 and 1.62 ± 0.22 individuals/ 100 km 2 , respectively) than for nonreproductive females (0.85 ± 0.19 individuals/100 km 2 ). In total, the best model estimated 4.44 ± 1.16 adult jaguars/100 km 2 (Table 3).
Off findings of the eight reproductive women having offspring into the studies months, we projected step one.64 cubs for each reproductive women on average. As well, you to definitely cub is registered by yourself on a single affair along with an as yet not known mommy. We omitted which lone observance from subsequent data. Based on reproductive lady density from the better design, i projected 3.23 cubs/100 km dos on research city. For this reason, i projected an entire occurrence out-of eight.67 jaguars/one hundred kilometer 2 . Jaguar population framework is actually 21% adult males, 11% nonreproductive lady, 26% reproductive girls, and you will 42% cubs (Dining table step three).